Great debate: Why Nats will be okay without Stephen Strasburg
Continue Reading - Pages: 1 2
At some point in the very near future, one fairly popular man in the Washington Nationals clubhouse will be shut down for the remainder of the 2012 season, while the remaining 24 on the current roster battle their way to what they hope will be the franchise’s first World Series Championship in seven years of existence.
As the shut-down date looms ominously on the horizon, the fervent Stephen Strasburg debate reaches new levels of intensity with each passing day. An array of solutions that would enable the star pitcher to continue into the postseason have been proposed ad nauseam by experts with extensive knowledge of the situation and regurgitated with far less detail by the commoner who cares little for the money and risk associated with the health of a perfectly good 24-year-old phenom.
Can’t he skip starts? Can’t they use a six-man rotation? Can’t he move to the bullpen? Can’t they surgically attach a third arm that he can use only until the playoffs arrive?
The solutions change frequently, and the people who offer them experience equally frequent changes of opinion. But throughout the entirety of this process, the genesis of which now seems like an eternity ago, general manager Mike Rizzo has maintained an adamant stance that would make even Stonewall Jackson proud. It is his decision alone. It is his responsibility. This decision takes guts, and taking young Stephen’s well-being into consideration, Rizzo made it without wavering.
It’s time we finally accept that decision. Stop asking “what if?” and start asking “what now?”
Strasburg is currently the proud owner of a 15-5 record and a 2.85 ERA. The sensational talent he brings to a five-man rotation is entirely unique, but the voluminous conversation over just one man, who’s just one part of an engine, has derailed what should be talk of a locomotive on a fast track to success.
So, let’s do something crazy: Let’s talk about the rest of the Nationals. Can they legitimately compete for the World Series without Strasburg? In a recent poll released by ESPN, 58.1 percent of America answered “no,” believing that the Nationals sans Strasburg would be eliminated from the playoffs in the first round.
I’m sorry America, but I beg to differ.
If there’s one thing that consistently wins championships, it’s pitching, and the Nationals have an abundance of it. The team currently owns the best ERA in baseball, which you may attribute in large part to Strasburg, but let me present you with an alternate universe with no Stephen. A world without Strasburg might not be so frightening after all.
After Sunday’s loss to their NL East rivals, the Philadelphia Phillies, the Nationals sit at 77-50, a .606 winning percentage. Strasburg has started 25 of those 127 games and their league-leading team ERA is 3.24. By simply removing each game Strasburg has pitched, 58.1 percent of the nation might see that this isn’t exactly a team bereft of talent.
By omitting Strasburg’s starts, the team record would change to 59-43, good for a .578 winning percentage and still ahead of Atlanta’s .567. The number of innings pitched would be altered from 1149.0 to 1003.2 and the earned runs would be change accordingly from 414 to 368. If you calculate that ERA, the statistical difference might go unnoticed. The aforementioned team ERA would shift from
3.24 with Strasburg to 3.30 without, still placing them atop the National League. Still not sold? Examine the individuals of the stud rotation.
Share and Enjoy
Continue Reading - Pages: 1 2